Actually, there are two wordfilter functions. One blackens "filthy" words, and another that rejects whole posts, e.g. for reason of spamming or hacking. But on principle, the purpose of a wordfilter isn't really in need to be explained, is it?

>>46

I was really hoping to get an explanation.

The best reason I can imagine is: To hide particular words from those who dont want to see these words.

Which of course is silly. Which is the second reason. Which is silly too.

>>47

> “To hide particular words from those who dont want to see these words.

> Which of course is silly. Which is the second reason. Which is silly too.”

The blackening-out wordfilter was meant to hide words in the meaning of your presumption, on the one hand it is meant to hide words from those who don't want to see them, on the other hand I think it is a shitty (or, as you said, a silly) bit of an ironic turn (cause noone else but you and the other guy you know well are posting here, but who knows? I gave the link to this imageboard to different people, and some of them at least had have a look at it. People meant here in the meaning of guys AND gurls inb4 als ob...).

The post rejecting wordfilter is best explained here: >>46

> “e.g. for reason of spamming or hacking”

>>52

>>56 the wordfilter file includes 114 words right nao. selecting them was dirty, dirty work.

>>58

Das erinnert mich an den Großinquisitor von Dostojewski: Die Kirche trägt schwer an der Aufgabe, die Wahrheit von den Gläubigen fernzuhalten (sie tut es mit gutem Gewissen).

>>59 als Inquisitorfag trug sich's recht leicht. War ja nicht das erste Wühlen im Klo des Internet...

pic unrelated